Peer assessment
The first group that presented yesterday was Ananya and Rania, their project was a VR headset What they did was that they printed the layout of the headset, stuck onto cardboard and then cut it out to create the headset. For the video, they downloaded a software where they can take screenshots to create a video.In their presentation, they fully explained their project well with all details.They were able to explain how it is made, what are its purposes and the different features included in the project itself.They were also able to show us how they created it themselves and not just that but also they were able to show us how the product actually works and also the final result of the project they created.Other than that they were also able to give us a descriptive and detailed description of what the project is, how it works, the materials used in it and how they were able to use technology for it.I believe their overall presentation was very good however maybe they could have tried to have more communication that may be could be more informative.I think their project is very good however, I don't really find it useful towards the society.
Another project that presented was done by Karim his project, was also a VR headset except Karim created his one movie that is around 25 mins long.His movie was created totally by himself, he created his ow work on Minecraft.On Minecraft, he used the different features to create a full work with many different objects that were set according to his persona desire of choices for objects to create.In his presentation, he presented to us the project in its final stage.He showed us a small video that was a part of the whole movie that showed the camera shown different perspectives of his world.Karim was able to describe all the different features of it and was also able to give us a detailed description of what it is, what were the steps he used and many other details about the project.I believe that Karim’s presentation was very clear and he was also able to informative and project his voice well.One thing I believe he can improve is maybe to add one or two more details like her it is targeted at and how it is useful.I really like his work, however, the only thing that I think should have been thought about was if it is useful in any kind of way but it can be useful as it ma inspires people to use regular software to create something very interesting.
Another project that also presented was made by Ward and Malak, their project is a photo shoot.What they created was that a photo border for people to take pictures using backgrounds and props that they will get.For the backgrounds, they will be using software to create the backgrounds fro people to ba able ton choose a background and have I at the back of them so that they can then use backgrounds when taking a picture with the background of their desire through a software that they will be using.Ward and Malak were able to give a good description with most of their features.I am; give their presentation was good, however, I think the still could have improved in term of communication as they didi not speak too much and did not give much information that would help us be informed fully about the project.Something I think they can improve is that maybe they can show us their very final result next time and also share with us some more information about it.I think it is a very nice project but not very beneficial however it is till beneficial in the way that it could entertain and provide people services in celebrations.
The next day more people presented their projects:
One of the groups that presented were Akshansh and Davide.Their project is a maze rover, this rover was made by the both of them however they used a kit with instructions to be able to build and compose the object but they were still able to independently program the object (rover) and also build the maze using cardboard and tape to build the maze 3D on the floor for people to be able to use it.They were able to give us a very good description of their project.with all the details to describe their project.They were successfully able to describe how it is made, how it is programmed and many other informative details about their projects.I believe their presentation and project were both very good but could still have used some improvements on it.Something they can improve is maybe they should be able to project their voices a little higher for us to hear them a little better and understand them a little better and maybe they can add a little comer details next time.
The next group that presented was Imaan and Gunce su, their project was paper speakers.Their project uses cables/wires and paper to be able to take music and project it with a louder sound.I think their presentation was okay but not very good as I could not really hear them or comprehend them as the handwriting on their slideshow/video was quite small which prevented me from being able to read any of the text on the slides/video.The described their project however it was not very clear and did not include many details and was not that informative so I was actually unable to know any details about their project and when they tried it it was notary successful but when they tried it a second time it didi not work but not well.Their presentation was okay but I was unable to understand much from it.For their project, I think it was good however when they tried doing it did not go very well.I think something they ca improve their presentation I maybe they should make a more detailed description for us to comprehend a little better and for us to be able to know more details about the project.
Another group that also presented was Ashkan and Arthur.Their project was the world that they created a game on their computer.It mainly involved them drawing animals and dinosaurs which as they mentioned was something that they enjoyed which allowed their project to be something fun for them.I think their presentation was good but not very good as they did not give much clear information about the project but could give a somewhat description of it, also their poster was quite unclear and hard to understand a little but I believe that their general project is really good however they need to improve their presentation and their communication skills with the audience.I believe maybe something that they can add to their presentation next time would be extra points about the project and maybe they should give a more detailed description and make a more clear poster for us to be able to understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment